Fact-Checking Policy

AIsecurityDojo aims to distinguish verified facts, documented product behavior, technical interpretation, and opinion.

Primary-source preference

For technical claims, we prefer official documentation, protocol specifications, security advisories, standards, product documentation, recognized security organizations, academic papers, and original repositories whenever appropriate.

Cross-checking

Important claims may be checked against multiple sources when a single source is incomplete, ambiguous, outdated, or commercially interested. Conflicting evidence should be described rather than silently resolved without support.

Product claims

Vendor statements about product capabilities are treated as vendor claims unless independently verified. We aim to avoid turning marketing language into factual technical conclusions without appropriate evidence.

Rapidly changing information

Features, prices, model behavior, APIs, security controls, and standards can change quickly. Readers should treat publication and update dates as part of the context and confirm time-sensitive details directly with the relevant provider or authoritative source.